This great video compares two versions of the Mac Mini to tell you which one is right for you.It is not like the iMac, and the Mac mini requires a good quality external monitor.
![]() Best Monitors Mini 2014 Mac Mini ToThe mini couldn't come close the NUC's PCIe x4 SSD or the ThinkCentre's 500GB, 7,200-rpm hard drive, which registered a blazing 309 and 138 MBps, respectively. While this rate is comparable to that scored by the iMac's identical hard drive (38.5 MBps), the Mac mini performed about half as quickly as the 69 MBps all-in-one desktop average. While it wasn't quite as fast as the NUC (5:02), the ThinkCentre (4:31) or its iMac cousin (3:49), the mini edged out our 6:26 all-in-one PC average.Our Mac mini's 500GB, 5,400-rpm hard drive copied 4.97GB of mixed media in 2 minutes and 28 seconds, resulting in a file-transfer rate of 34.4 MBps. The Mac mini performed almost identically to Apple's 2014 iMac all-in-one (5,464), which packs the same processor as the mini but with 8GB of RAM.Apple's mini computer had little trouble with our spreadsheet test, matching 20,000 names to their addresses in 6 minutes and 17 seconds. Error 1045 28000 access denied for user rootlocalhost using password no macWith the new Handoff feature, you can start composing a text, email or document on your iOS device and finish it on your Mac (or vice versa) with a single click.The Handoff feature worked seamlessly in my testing — whenever I started composing a note or message on my iPhone, I immediately saw a prompt on my OS X dock to transfer it to a Mac. OS X Yosemite and AppsThe Mac mini ships with Apple's OS X Yosemite, which adds some useful new tweaks to Apple's operating system while allowing your Mac to work seamlessly with your iOS devices.As long as your Mac and iPhone or iPad are connected to the same Wi-Fi network (and are logged in to the same iCloud account), you can answer calls and texts from the desktop without reaching for your phone. Apple's computer fell behind the Intel HD 6000-powered NUC (33.57 fps), and mustered less than half of our 54-fps average for all-in-one desktops. The NUC notched only 26 fps under the same settings, and both PCs fell to the high teens with the graphics kicked to ultra.The Mac mini registered 22.97 fps on the OpenGL portion of the Cinebench benchmark, which tests a machine's GPU. ![]() Mac fans should also consider the $999 iMac, which offers comparable performance with an included display, mouse and keyboard. And though it's not the most miniature mini PC around, the Mac mini still looks slick on your desk or next to your TV.You can no longer swap out the Mac mini's RAM and storage, which could make the PC less useful over time as you run out of storage or run apps that max out your memory. The PC's Thunderbolt 2 ports and Intel Iris Pro graphics support will come in handy for creative professionals and power users, while the machine's 4th-gen Intel Core i5 processor provides more than enough power for Web surfing and entertainment. Bottom LineThe 2014 Mac mini (starting at $499) is an attractive, affordable and efficient OS X machine. You'll have to shell out $3,000 to get your hands on one (no monitor or accessories included), but you'll be getting a beefy quad-core Xeon E5 processor, 12GB of RAM and dual AMD FirePro D300 GPUs in return. However, because the iMac is tied to its monitor, you won't be able to throw it in your bag or easily hook it up to your TV as you can with the Mini.While the Mac mini and iMac are for everyday consumers, the Mac Pro is built for power users. Although Tom's Guide is under the same general branding as Tom's Hardware, they target different demographics and so the reviews will differ in levels of technical details. That would have been useful to note.This is a Tom's Guide review and focuses on the consumer segment of things, and not necessarily the power users who actually make use of VMs. Not everyone plays games on their computer and some of us need powerful machines to support VMs (virtual machines) like Parallels and Fusion.The Mini no longer offers a quad core option (your hardware article did not even mention cores!) so even a maxed-out memory, solid-state model won't match the older 2012 quad core performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorAaron ArchivesCategories |